No issues of fact exist as to whether petitioner complained about the lighting in the examination room on the day he took the examination, and, even if he did, that the alleged excessive glare caused him a disadvantage (see Matter of Lawson v Levitt,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN THE MATTER OF ROUSE v. CITY OF NEW YORK
5 A.D.3d 274 (2004)
773 N.Y.S.2d 302
In the Matter of CARLTON E. ROUSE, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 23, 2004.
March 23, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
