1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 19 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 19 Cal.Rptr.3d 247 (2004)
 

HUGHES v. HUGHES

No. B168913.

19 Cal.Rptr.3d 247 (2004)

122 Cal.App.4th 931

Albert HUGHES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Allen HUGHES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

Rehearing Denied October 13, 2004.

Review Denied January 19, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Michael A. Weiss and Michael A. Weiss, Irvine, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Morris Polich & Purdy, Richard H. Nakamura, Michael P. West, Los Angeles, and Pamela A. Hill for Defendants and Respondents.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

MOSK, J.

INTRODUCTION

A Vanity Fair magazine article quoted defendant and respondent Albert Hughes, Jr.,1 as saying, "Our dad's a pimp." A USA Today article quoted defendant and respondent Allen Hughes, Albert Jr.'s twin brother, as saying their father "dabbled in the pimptorial arts." The Hughes brothers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases