The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning identification and credibility. Appellant's larcenous intent may be inferred from his participation in an attack upon the victim, during which property was taken, since this unprovoked attack had no apparent motive other than robbery (see e.g. Matter of Eliazar G.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
