While plaintiff contends that the Judicial Hearing Officer assigned to oversee jury selection erroneously granted defendant's Batson challenge, the record is inadequate to permit review of, much less reversal based upon, the disputed ruling.
Although it appears that plaintiff did present sufficient objective medical evidence to raise a jury question as to whether he had sustained either "significant" or "permanent" injury within the meaning of Insurance Law...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
