Good cause existed for the filing of a late motion for summary judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3212 (a), where the court acquiesced in, and had actual knowledge of, ongoing discovery subsequent to the filing of the note of issue. This was confirmed in a writing authored by plaintiff's counsel. Under such circumstances, the court's tacit consent to consideration of the motion was within its discretion (cf. Brill v City of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
QUIZHPI v. LOCHINVAR CORPORATION
12 A.D.3d 252 (2004)
785 N.Y.S.2d 431
SEGUNDO QUIZHPI, Appellant, v. LOCHINVAR CORPORATION et al., Respondents, and TJERNLUND PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Defendants. (And Other Actions.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 18, 2004.
November 18, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
