1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 12 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 12 Cal.Rptr.3d 240 (2004)
 

LONDON v. DRI-HONING CORP.

No. C043096.

12 Cal.Rptr.3d 240 (2004)

117 Cal.App.4th 999

Morrie LONDON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DRI-HONING CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

April 19, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wright & Britton, Harold C. Wright and John A. Britton for Defendants and Appellants.

Siegel & Yee, Dan Siegel and Noreen Farrell for Plaintiff and Respondent.

DAVIS, J.

In this appeal, we conclude that a motion for discovery monetary sanctions may be made after an underlying motion to compel further response to an inspection demand is litigated. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031, subd. (m).)1 We will accordingly affirm the trial court's order imposing over $6,000 in monetary sanctions. (See § 904.1, subd. (a)(12).)

BACKGROUND

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases