RAMIS CREW CORRIGAN & BACHRACH v. STOELK

CCV0205809; A122808.

92 P.3d 154 (2004)

193 Or. App. 700

RAMIS CREW CORRIGAN & BACHRACH, LLP, an Oregon limited liability partnership, Hibbard Caldwell Schultz Ramis & Crew, an assumed business name, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, Hibbard Caldwell & Schultz, PC, an Oregon professional corporation, Plaintiff below, v. Stephen L. STOELK and B.A.S.S. Construction Company, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Appellants-Cross-Respondents, and Shanna L. Stoelk, Cross-Respondent, and Title Insurance Company of Oregon, dba First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon, an Oregon corporation, Defendant below. Ramis Crew Corrigan & Bachrach, LLP, an Oregon limited liability partnership, Hibbard Caldwell Schultz Ramis & Crew, an assumed business name, and Hibbard Caldwell & Schultz, PC, an Oregon professional corporation, Appellants, v. Stephen L. Stoelk, Shanna L. Stoelk, and B.A.S.S. Construction Company, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Respondents, and Title Insurance Company of Oregon, dba First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon, an Oregon corporation, Defendant below.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 9, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Elizabeth Duncan, Portland, and Green & Markley, P.C., filed a response dated January 23, 2004, for respondent-cross-appellant and appellants Ramis Crew Corrigan & Bachrach, LLP and Hibbard Caldwell & Schultz, PC.

Richard W. Todd, Portland, filed a memorandum in response to order to show cause dated January 23, 2004, for appellants-cross-respondents Stephen L. Stoelk and B.A.S.S. Construction Company, Inc.

Before BREWER, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and LINDER, Judge.


On Court's Order to Show Cause Entered January 8, 2004.

BREWER, P.J.

After defendants filed their notice of appeal from a judgment, the trial court entered an amended judgment. Thereafter, plaintiff Ramis Crew Corrigan & Bachrach, LLP (Ramis Crew) cross-appealed from the original judgment and plaintiffs Ramis Crew and Hibbard Caldwell & Schultz, P.C., appealed from the amended judgment.1 This court issued an order to show...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases