The parties' intent to be mutually bound to pay for the institutional care of their disabled adult son for the balance of his life is clear from their so-ordered stipulation, incorporated, but not merged, into their ensuing divorce judgment. Although, pursuant to the stipulation, defendant had the option of meeting his obligation by arranging for disbursements from trusts created by his parents to fund a supplemental needs trust for
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HAYNES v. HAYNES
5 A.D.3d 234 (2004)
772 N.Y.S.2d 818
SOPHY P.-Q. HAYNES, Respondent, v. ROBERT B. HAYNES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 16, 2004.
March 16, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.