NEXTEL v. SPRING VAL ASSESSOR


4 Misc.3d 233 (2004)

771 N.Y.S.2d 853

In the Matter of NEXTEL OF NEW YORK, INC., Petitioner, v. ASSESSOR FOR THE VILLAGE OF SPRING VALLEY et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Rockland County.

February 2, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick J. Raymond, Binghamton, for petitioner.

Bruce M. Levine, Spring Valley, for respondents.


OPINION OF THE COURT

THOMAS A. DICKERSON, J.

Cell Towers are Taxable

The petitioner, Nextel of New York, Inc. asserts that its telecommunications equipment (Nextel's Spring Valley communications equipment) is not taxable real property. The communications equipment consists of 12 antennae in three sectors of 4 each on top of a 110-foot-high steel water tank and are used along with two global positioning devices or timing devices to receive and transmit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases