DAIMLERCHRYSLER v. SPITZER


6 Misc.3d 228 (2004)

782 N.Y.S.2d 610

In the Matter of DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. ELIOT SPITZER, as Attorney General of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Albany County.

September 14, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rose Law Firm, PLLC, Albany (Keith B. Rose of counsel), for petitioners.

Eliot Spitzer, pro se, and Matthew J. Barbaro, Albany, for Eliot Spitzer, respondent.

Tobin & Dempf, LLP, Albany (Michael L. Costello of counsel), for New York State Dispute Resolution Association, respondent.


OPINION OF THE COURT

JOSEPH R. CANNIZZARO, J.

Introduction:

This CPLR article 78 proceeding concerns General Business Law § 198-a, known as the "New Car Lemon Law." Petitioners, which are manufacturers of new motor vehicles sold in New York State, commenced this proceeding to enjoin respondents from using materials, including award forms promulgated for New Car Lemon Law arbitrations, which proscribe an allegedly incorrect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases