1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 12 A.D.3d
  5. 12 A.D.3d 222 (2004)
 

BLITZER v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY

12 A.D.3d 222 (2004)

784 N.Y.S.2d 528

ANDREW BLITZER, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 16, 2004.

The complaint fails to state a claim for either gender or disability discrimination in the hiring process. The assertion that plaintiff was a member of a protected subclass of "attractive males" failed to identify a recognized class protected by statute (see generally Kent v Papert Cos., 309 A.D.2d 234 [2003]).

Plaintiff has failed to state a claim for disability discrimination ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases