HUTCHINS v. PEABODY

No. 2003-368

151 N.H. 82 (2004)

STEPHEN HUTCHINS & a. v. ROBIN PEABODY & a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Opinion Issued: May 25, 2004


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen Hutchins and Anne Hutchins, by brief and orally, pro se.

Martha M. Jacques, of Milford, by brief and orally, for the defendants.


DUGGAN, J.

The defendants, Robin Peabody and Armand Comtois, appeal a ruling of the Keene District Court (Talbot, J.) that the plaintiffs, Stephen and Anne Hutchins, were entitled to recover possession of an apartment occupied by the defendants. On appeal, the defendants argue that the trial court erred when it held that RSA 540:13-d (1997) was not applicable. We reverse and remand.

The record supports the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases