1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 12 A.D.3d
  5. 12 A.D.3d 218 (2004)
 

SEINFELD v. ROBINSON

12 A.D.3d 218 (2004)

783 N.Y.S.2d 813

FRANK DAVID SEINFELD et al., Respondents, v. JAMES D. ROBINSON, III, et al., Defendants, et al., Nominal Defendant. WILLIAM C. RAND, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 16, 2004.

No appeal lies from an order, such as this, entered on default of the aggrieved party (CPLR 5511; Gale v Liffey Van Lines, 269 A.D.2d 195 [2000], lv dismissed 94 N.Y.2d 941 [2000]). In any event, the motion for attorneys' fees was deniable on the merits. This was a situation in which "a pro se [objector] who [was] also an attorney should not [have been] awarded attorney's fees" (...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases