The determination that petitioner's vehicle was overweight in violation of 34 RCNY 4-15 (b) (9) is supported by substantial evidence. Although the summons inaccurately described where the violation was first observed, petitioner was sufficiently apprised of the charges against it and was not deprived of an opportunity to present a defense (see Matter of Resciniti v Department of Motor Vehs.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN THE MATTER OF FERGUSON HAULING CORP. v. MARTINEZ
11 A.D.3d 214 (2004)
782 N.Y.S.2d 429
In the Matter of FERGUSON HAULING CORP., Petitioner, v. RAYMOND P. MARTINEZ, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Traffic Violations Bureau, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 5, 2004.
October 5, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
