Respondents provided the pro se petitioner with certain records pursuant to his Freedom of Information Law request during the pendency of the litigation. Their certification that all responsive documents had been disclosed, and that a diligent search had been conducted for the documents they could not locate, satisfied the requirements of Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (Matter of Rattley v New York City Police Dept.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN THE MATTER OF ROBLES v. BORAKOVE
6 A.D.3d 216 (2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 320
In the Matter of RAFAEL ROBLES, Appellant, v. ELLEN BORAKOVE et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 8, 2004.
April 8, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
