The court properly exercised its discretion in precluding testimony as to a statement made by an accomplice who testified against defendant, since the statement was ambiguous and its value was for cumulative impeachment purposes (see People v Duncan,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.