1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 94 P.3d
  5. 94 P.3d 123 (2004)
 

MEADER v. MEADER

00C-33824, A120628.

94 P.3d 123 (2004)

194 Or.App. 31

Karen MEADER and Harry Meader, Respondents, v. David MEADER and Alice Meader, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 30, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Meader and Alice Meader filed the briefs pro se for appellants.

Lance D. Youd, Salem, filed the brief for respondents.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and ORTEGA, Judges.

ORTEGA, J.

Parents appeal from an order denying their request for modification of a judgment awarding substantial visitation to paternal grandparents. Because the trial court determined that there was no substantial change in circumstances to require modification of the original judgment, it did not address the children's best interests. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3) (2001),1 and reverse, concluding that the best interests of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases