1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 98 P.3d
  5. 98 P.3d 116 (2004)
 

MAYER v. STO INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 29549-1-II.

98 P.3d 116 (2004)

123 Wash.App. 443

Kurtis and Pamela MAYER, Respondents, v. STO INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

September 21, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Benjamin Meade, Forsberg & Umlauf, Seattle, WA, Warren J. Daheim, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

Kenneth F. Hobbs, Stafford Frey Cooper, Seattle, WA, Philip Albert Talmadge, Talmadge Law Group PLLC, Tukwila, WA, for Appellant.

BRIDGEWATER, J.

Sto Industries, Inc. appeals the imposition of discovery sanctions and attorney fees after a second trial that we ordered because of newly discovered evidence that Sto failed to disclose before the first trial. Kurtis and Pamela Mayer cross-appeal, asserting that the trial court should have imposed a greater discovery sanction and that they were entitled to recover all their costs for the second trial. We hold when the trial court imposes discovery...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases