Inasmuch as plaintiffs, in support of their motion, presented evidence showing that their vehicle, while stopped, was hit from behind by defendants' vehicle, and appellants, in responding to the motion, submitted only the affirmation of counsel, who had no first-hand knowledge of the facts, the motion was properly granted (see Mitchell v Gonzalez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BAUZA v. STUBBS
5 A.D.3d 208 (2004)
772 N.Y.S.2d 818
DANIEL BAUZA et al., Respondents, v. CURTIS STUBBS et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 11, 2004.
March 11, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
