1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 845 A.2d
  5. 845 A.2d 1281 (2004)
 

COHEN v. THOFT

845 A.2d 1281 (2004)

368 N.J. Super. 338

George N. COHEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kirsten THOFT, Ted Nadeau and Princeton Borough Zoning Board of Adjustment, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 19, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George N. Cohen, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Christopher S. Tarr, Princeton, argued the cause for respondents Kirsten Thoft and Ted Nadeau (Smith, Stratton, Wise, Heher & Brennan, attorneys; Mr. Tarr, of counsel; F. Clifford Gibbons, on the brief).

William T. Sutphin, Princeton, argued the cause for respondent Princeton Borough Zoning Board of Adjustment.

Before Judges SKILLMAN, COBURN and FISHER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a trial court's determination that an action in lieu of prerogative writs should be dismissed because it was filed three days beyond the fortyfive day period allowed under Rule 4:69-6(b)(3).

Defendants Kirsten Thoft and Ted Nadeau plan to construct a new deck and a second floor addition to a two-family house they own in Princeton Borough. The house is located in a zoning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases