BETTS v. ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC.

No. 5D03-825.

863 So.2d 1252 (2004)

Wendy BETTS and John Cardegna, Appellants, v. ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC., and Check Express, Inc., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 2, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Casper of James, Hoyer, Newcomer & Smiljanich, P.A., Tampa, and E. Clayton Yates of Law Office of E. Clayton Yates, Fort Pierce, for Appellants.

Neal A Sivyer, Paul D. Watson and R.J. Haughey, II, of Sivyer Barlow & Watson, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.


MONACO, J.

Although the appellants raise a number of matters for our consideration, we conclude that the trial court committed no error and affirm. We write to address one issue, however, concerning whether an amendment to rule 1.442, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, applies in an on-going case where the acceptance period of a proposal for settlement has expired on the effective date of the amendment. We agree with the trial judge that it does not.

The appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases