1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 13 A.D.3d
  5. 13 A.D.3d 196 (2004)
 

BROOKMAN & BROOKMAN P.C. v. JOSEPH FLEISCHER NATURAL COIFFURES, INC.

13 A.D.3d 196 (2004)

785 N.Y.S.2d 907

BROOKMAN & BROOKMAN P.C., Appellant, v. JOSEPH FLEISCHER NATURAL COIFFURES, INC., et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 16, 2004.

Plaintiff law firm made no attempt to verify any of its efforts by producing work product or other independent evidence to corroborate the invoices, which defendants amply demonstrated contained discrepancies and inconsistent entries. Because the Special Referee reviewed the appropriate factors enunciated in Matter of Karp (145 A.D.2d 208 [1989]), there is no reason to disturb the amount of fees awarded (Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases