PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellant's response to the court's order of January 20, 2004, the court has determined that the notice of appeal was not timely filed because the motion for reconsideration did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal of the order denying appellant's 3.800(a) motion. See Griffis v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.