1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 12 A.D.3d
  5. 12 A.D.3d 192 (2004)
 

PEOPLE v. LAW

12 A.D.3d 192 (2004)

783 N.Y.S.2d 812

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RENARD LAW, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 9, 2004.

Defendant, having absconded from parole supervision, is not presently available to obey the mandate of the court (see People v Perez, 38 N.Y.2d 904 [1976]). Were we not dismissing the appeal, we would affirm, concluding that the court's Sandoval ruling was a proper exercise of discretion, that defendant received effective assistance of counsel, and that defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases