TSADILAS v. PROVIDIAN NATIONAL BANK


13 A.D.3d 190 (2004)

786 N.Y.S.2d 478

MILAGROS TSADILAS, Appellant, v. PROVIDIAN NATIONAL BANK, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 16, 2004.


Defendant sufficiently proved that it sent the arbitration provision to plaintiff (see e.g. Kurz v Chase Manhattan Bank USA, 319 F.Supp.2d 457, 464 [SD NY 2004]). Plaintiff consented to it by failing to opt out (cf. Providian Natl. Bank v Screws, ___ So 2d ___, 2003 WL 22272861, 2003 Ala LEXIS 298 [Ala 2003]) and by continuing to use her credit cards (see e.g. Kurz, 319 F Supp 2d at 465-466). Plaintiff is bound...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases