1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 862 A.2d
  5. 862 A.2d 1156 (2004)
 

EPPERSON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

862 A.2d 1156 (2004)

373 N.J. Super. 522

Josefina EPPERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Respondent, and Franklin Township, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 20, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Z. Schalk, Somerville, argued the cause for appellant (Mauro, Savo, Camerino & Grant, attorneys; Mr. Schalk, of counsel and on the brief).

Richard D. Millet, Somerville, argued the cause for respondent (Richard D. Millet & Associates, attorneys, Mr. Millet, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges WEFING, PAYNE and C.S. FISHER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FISHER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Josefina Epperson filed a complaint, asserting various causes of action claimed to have resulted from her termination as an employee of defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. At trial, after plaintiff rested her case, Wal-Mart successfully moved for an involuntary dismissal of plaintiff's malicious prosecution and wrongful termination claims. Because the trial judge mistakenly interpreted the law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases