KONCZYK v. KONCZYK


843 A.2d 1167 (2004)

367 N.J. Super. 512

Patricia KONCZYK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerome KONCZYK, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 15, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael S. Rothmel, Mount Holly, for appellant.

Dianne L. Robbins, Co-Executrix of the Estate of Jerome J. Konczyk, respondent pro se.

Before Judges KESTIN, CUFF and LARIO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CUFF, J.A.D.

The single issue presented in this appeal is how much, if anything, plaintiff may receive from a life insurance policy on the life of her former husband. Judge Suter concluded that plaintiff was entitled to no more than the amount of alimony defendant would have been obliged to pay in accordance with the terms of the Judgment of Divorce (JOD), if he had lived. We affirm.

Plaintiff Patricia Konczyk and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases