KRIPP v. KRIPP


849 A.2d 1159 (2004)

Robin KRIPP, Appellee v. Anthony KRIPP, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided May 27, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carolyn Rose Mirabile, Norristown, for Anthony Kripp, appellant.

Michael James Reed, Malvern, for Robin Kripp, appellee.

D. Michael Fisher, Pittsburgh, for the Com. of PA.

Before: CAPPY, C.J., CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR and LAMB, JJ.


OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

We granted review in this case to consider the trial court's decision to admit parol evidence on the meaning of the alimony provision in a property settlement agreement between Appellant Anthony Kripp and his former wife, Appellee Robin Kripp. For all of the reasons that follow, we hold that parol evidence was admissible. Accordingly, we reverse the order of the Superior Court and reinstate the order of the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases