The court properly admitted the victim's 911 tape under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule. The evidence, including the tape itself, establishes that the victim made the call immediately after the termination of a particularly heinous home-invasion robbery involving imminent danger to a young child, and that at the time of the call the victim was still under stress and excitement resulting from this incident and was not yet capable of studied reflection ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
