1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 843 A.2d
  5. 843 A.2d 1120 (2004)
 

BUONO v. SCALIA

843 A.2d 1120 (2004)

179 N.J. 131

Kathryn BUONO, by her Guardian ad Litem Vincent Buono and Vincent Buono Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael SCALIA and Lisa Scalia, Defendants, and Alphonse Scalia, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 29, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew R. Pomo, Kearny, argued the cause for appellants (Doyle & Brady, attorneys).

John V. Mallon, Secaucus, argued the cause for respondent (Chasan, Leyner, Bariso & Lamparello, attorneys).

Justice VERNIERO delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal implicates the doctrine of parental immunity articulated in Foldi v. Jeffries, 93 N.J. 533, 461 A.2d 1145 (1983). The trial court and Appellate Division each concluded that, on the narrow facts presented, the parents in this case are immune from suit. We agree and affirm. We emphasize...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases