1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 857 A.2d
  5. 857 A.2d 1089 (2004)
 

LEVITT v. FAX.COM, INC.

No. 21, Sept. Term, 2003.

857 A.2d 1089 (2004)

383 Md. 141

Bruce LEVITT v. FAX.COM, INC., et al.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

September 13, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael C. Worsham, Forest Hill (Stephen H. Ring, Stephen H. Ring, P.C., Gaithersburg), all on brief, for Appellants.

Ronald A. Baradel (Peter F. Axelrad, Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A., Annapolis), on brief, for Appellees.

Argued before BELL, C.J., ELDRIDGE, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL and BATTAGLIA, JJ.

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

The broad question presented by this case is the same as the question recently decided by this Court in R.A. Ponte Architects, Ltd. v. Investors Alert, Inc., et al., 382 Md. 689, 857 A.2d 1 (2004), in which we filed an opinion a few weeks ago. That question is whether Maryland trial courts are authorized to entertain a private cause of action for damages under the federal Telephone...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases