The court properly denied defendant's challenge for cause to a prospective juror. The panelist's reference to the possible influence of her experience as the victim of credit card fraud did not raise a serious question as to her ability to serve, and, in any event, the court elicited an unequivocal assurance of her impartiality and her willingness to follow the law as to the People's burden of proof (see People v Chambers,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
