1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 93 P.3d
  5. 93 P.3d 99 (2004)
 

REGAL INS. CO. v. CANAL INS. CO.

No. 20020198.

93 P.3d 99 (2004)

2004 UT 19

REGAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Petitioner, v. CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Utah.

February 27, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Trent J. Waddoups, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.

Heinz J. Mahler, Salt Lake City, for defendant.

On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals

PARRISH, Justice:

¶ 1 In this case, we address the statutory procedure applicable to Utah insurers seeking reimbursement of no-fault or personal injury protection ("PIP") benefits from other insurers. An insurer paid a PIP benefit claim to its insured and then, by filing suit, sought reimbursement for that payment from the tortfeasor's insurer. We are called upon to decide whether binding arbitration is the exclusive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases