1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 15 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 176 (2004)
 

DEFEND THE BAY v. CITY OF IRVINE

No. G032062.

15 Cal.Rptr.3d 176 (2004)

119 Cal.App.4th 1261

DEFEND THE BAY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF IRVINE et al., Defendant and Respondent; The Irvine Company, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

June 29, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson & Cross, Kevin K. Johnson and Jared Phil Hanson, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rutan & Tucker, Robert S. Bower and Jeffrey T. Melching, Costa Mesa, for Defendant and Respondent.

Latham & Watkins, Christopher W. Garrett, Amy G. Nefouse and Daniel P. Brunton, San Diego, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

BEDSWORTH, J.

Defend the Bay appeals from a judgment that denied its petition for a peremptory writ of mandate to compel the City of Irvine (the City) to rescind its approval of an environmental impact report (EIR). It argues there is insufficient evidence to support conclusions regarding impacts in three areas — housing, agricultural resources, and biological resources. We disagree, and so...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases