1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 890 So.2d
  5. 890 So.2d 968 (2004)
 

EX PARTE CANADA

1021732.

890 So.2d 968 (2004)

Ex parte Phillip A. CANADA. (In re Phillip A. Canada v. Vic Goode).

Supreme Court of Alabama.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing March 26, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael C. Bradley of Pittman, Hooks, Dutton, Kirby & Hellums, P.C., Birmingham, for petitioner.

Paul P. Bolus and Stephen J. Bumgarner of Burr & Forman, LLP, Birmingham, for respondent.

Ed R. Haden and Scott B. Grover of Balch & Bingham, LLP, Birmingham, for amicus curiae Business Council of Alabama, in support of the respondent's application for rehearing.

LYONS, Justice.

The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed, without opinion, the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Vic Goode in Phillip A. Canada's action against the manufacturer of a table saw and several of his co-employees alleging that his co-employees were liable for the failure to maintain a safety device. Canada v. Goode (No. 2020038, July 3, 2003), ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Civ.App.2003) (table). We granted the petition for the writ of certiorari, and we...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases