1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 855 A.2d
  5. 855 A.2d 996 (2004)
 

TRAYSTMAN, CORIC AND KERAMIDAS v. DAIGLE

No. 24040.

855 A.2d 996 (2004)

84 Conn.App. 843

TRAYSTMAN, CORIC AND KERAMIDAS v. Andrew J. DAIGLE.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided September 7, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lloyd L. Langhammer, Norwich, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Martin M. Rutchik, Norwich, with whom was Sharon L. Gibbs, for the appellee (defendant).

LAVERY, C.J., and BISHOP and WEST, Js.

WEST, J.

In this action on a promissory note to pay $26,873 for legal services, the plaintiff law firm, Traystman, Coric and Keramidas, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, concluding that the note was void and unenforceable. The issue on appeal is whether the court properly found that the note was signed under duress.1 We affirm the judgment of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases