Defendant's claim that the prosecutor improperly cross-examined him about an omission from his postarrest written statement is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that this cross-examination was proper because defendant had acknowledged that his written exculpatory statement was a complete account of the incident, so that his failure to mention the omitted exculpatory information at that time was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
