1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 852 A.2d
  5. 852 A.2d 957 (2004)
 

MURRAY v. GOODWIN

No. 02-CV-176.

852 A.2d 957 (2004)

Winston MURRAY and Naomi Smith, Appellants, v. Ibrahim GOODWIN, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided July 1, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederic W. Schwartz, Jr., Washington, DC, for appellants.

Lita Rosario for appellee.

Before TERRY and GLICKMAN, Associate Judges, and BELSON, Senior Judge.

GLICKMAN, Associate J.

The trial court awarded summary judgment to appellee Ibrahim Goodwin on the ground that appellants Winston Murray and Naomi Smith were collaterally estopped from relitigating a critical issue that was resolved against them in a related lawsuit between the same parties. This court subsequently reversed the decision in that related lawsuit and remanded the case for further proceedings, thereby nullifying the finality required for collateral estoppel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases