1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 860 A.2d
  5. 860 A.2d 940 (2004)
 

SHAH v. SHAH

860 A.2d 940 (2004)

373 N.J. Super. 47

Gayatri SHAH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mayank K. SHAH, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 9, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald M. Abramson, Hackensack, argued the cause for appellant (Kleeblatt, Galler, Abramson & Zakim, attorneys; Thomas R. McConnell, on the brief).

Jane A. Herchenroder, Somerville, argued the cause for respondent (Susan Servis, on the letter brief).

Before Judges KESTIN, ALLEY and FALCONE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KESTIN, P.J.A.D.

On August 22, 2003, plaintiff, Gayatri Shah, filed a complaint seeking relief under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act of 1991 (the Act), N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17 to -35. Following the entry of a temporary restraining order (TRO), defendant, Mayank Shah, moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the person. The trial court denied that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases