1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 12 A.D.3d
  5. 12 A.D.3d 165 (2004)
 

PEOPLE v. WATKINS

12 A.D.3d 165 (2004)

786 N.Y.S.2d 133

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PAUL WATKINS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 4, 2004.

Although translation of a victim's testimony was slow and difficult because the interpreter and the victim spoke different dialects, and although the interpreter sometimes had to make multiple attempts to translate a question, the record fails to support defendant's contentions that the interpreter was unqualified or that he failed to interpret properly (see People v Nedal, 198 A.D.2d 42 [1993]; People v Frazier,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases