1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 840 A.2d
  5. 840 A.2d 925 (2004)
 

ROGERS v. CARCHESIO

840 A.2d 925 (2004)

366 N.J. Super. 181

Momudo F. ROGERS and Josephine Rogers-Moore, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Julian M. CARCHESIO, Julian Katera Designs, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 29, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia B. Adams, Freehold, argued the cause for appellants (Campbell, Foley, Lee, Murphy & Cernigliaro, attorneys; Ms. Adams on the brief).

Michael S. Simon, Trenton, argued the cause for respondents (Simon, Monahan & Simon, attorneys; Mr. Simon on the brief).

Before Judges CONLEY, WECKER and WEISSBARD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WEISSBARD, J.A.D.

Defendants, Julian M. Carchesio and Julian Katera Designs, Inc. (Katera), appeal from a judgment in the amount of $6400 in favor of plaintiffs, Momudo F. Rogers and Josephine Rogers-Moore. The judgment represented the amount of property damage sustained by the Rogers vehicle in an accident on December 14, 2001. We reverse and order entry of a judgment for defendants.

The relevant facts are quite simple...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases