PER CURIAM.
The issue in this case is whether the testimony of the forensic accountant concerning plaintiff's loss of future earning ability was so based on speculation, conjecture, and incorrect assumptions that a new trial should have been ordered by the trial court. The expert's figures, not finalized until shortly before her testimony and calculated without discussing them with plaintiff or reading his deposition, assumed
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.