1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 870 So.2d
  5. 870 So.2d 864 (2004)
 

ROBOBAR, INC., v. HILTON INTERNATIONAL CO.,

No. 3D03-1641.

870 So.2d 864 (2004)

ROBOBAR, INC., Robobar Limited, and Roboserve, Inc., Appellants, v. HILTON INTERNATIONAL CO., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied April 28, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Armstrong & Mejer, P.A., and Timothy J. Armstrong, Coral Gables, for appellants.

William L. Petros, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN, J., and BARKDULL, THOMAS H., JR., Senior Judge.

BARKDULL, Senior Judge.

We find from the record that the trial court committed no reversible error in the entry of the summary judgments and directed verdict under review.

The contract sued upon was drafted by appellant, Robobar Limited, and it was appropriate for the trial court to construe, as a matter of law, the contract's expiration date. See Khosrow Maleki, P.A., v. M.A. Hajianpour M.D., P.A., 771 So.2d 628...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases