JONES APPAREL GROUP v. MAXWELL SHOE CO.

C.A. No. 365-N.

883 A.2d 837 (2004)

JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC., and MSC Acquisition Corp., Plaintiffs, v. MAXWELL SHOE COMPANY, INC., Mark J. Cocozza, James T. Tinagero, Stephen A. Fine, Malcolm L. Sherman and Anthony J. Tiberii, Defendants.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County.

Decided: May 27, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jesse A. Finkelstein, Raymond J. DiCamillo, Brock E. Czeschin, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Paul C. Saunders, Timothy G. Cameron, Andrew B. Kratenstein, Cravath, Swaine & Moore, L.L.P., New York City, for the Plaintiffs.

William M. Lafferty, Frederick H. Alexander, David J. Teklits, Patricia R. Uhlenbrock, James D. Honaker, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, DE; Adam H. Offerhartz, Jennifer H. Rearden, Robert E. Malchman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, L.L.P., New York City, for the Defendants.


OPINION

STRINE, Vice Chancellor.

This expedited case centers on the validity of a charter provision of Maxwell Shoe Company, Inc. By its plain terms, that provision establishes that the record date for any consent solicitation of Maxwell's stockholders shall be the date on which the first consent is delivered to the company. In so providing, the charter adopts one of the default rules set forth in 8 Del. C.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases