1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 376 F.3d
  5. 376 F.3d 1339 (2004)
 

GLAXO GROUP LTD. v. APOTEX, INC.

No. 03-1575.

376 F.3d 1339 (2004)

GLAXO GROUP LIMITED and Smithkline Beecham Corp., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. APOTEX, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied September 10, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis J. Mondolino, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were Michael F. Hurley, Brett M. Schuman, Esther H. Steinhauer, Brian W. Nolan and Christopher S. Pennisi. Of counsel was Thomas M. Peterson, of San Francisco, CA.

Scott B. Feder, Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP, of Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Hugh L. Moore, Hugh S. Balsam and Kevin M. Nelson.

Before SCHALL, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA. Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge DYK.

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

Apotex, Inc. ("Apotex") appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, which found that Apotex's filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA") for a generic version of the antibiotic Ceftin(R) willfully infringed U.S. Patent No. 4,562,181 (the "...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases