1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 861 A.2d
  5. 861 A.2d 849 (2004)
 

STATE v. CARLINO

861 A.2d 849 (2004)

373 N.J. Super. 377

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Samuel P. CARLINO, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 12, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell J. Ansell, Ocean, argued the cause for appellant (Ansell, Zaro, Grim & Aaron, attorneys; Mr. Ansell, on the brief).

Steven A. Yomtov, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Yomtov, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, R.B. COLEMAN and HOLSTON, JR.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HOLSTON, JR., J.A.D.

On this appeal, we address whether the presence of surveillance and monitoring equipment justify a "no-knock" search warrant in a narcotics investigation. We also determine the scope of a provision in the search warrant that allows for a search by law enforcement of "any and all persons arriving at, departing from and located therein reasonably believed to be associated with the investigation....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases