1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 378 F.3d
  5. 378 F.3d 1330 (2004)
 

IN RE WALLACH

No. 03-1327.

378 F.3d 1330 (2004)

In re David WALLACH, Hartmut Engelmann, Dan Aderka, Daniela Novick and Menachem Rubinstein.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided August 11, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger L. Browdy, Browdy and Neimark, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued for appellants.

Mary L. Kelly, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, VA, argued for the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. With her on the brief were John M. Whealan, Solicitor; and Raymond T. Chen, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel were Stephen Walsh and William LaMarca, Associate Solicitors.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

David Wallach, Hartmut Engelmann, Dan Aderka, Daniela Novick, and Menachem Rubinstein (collectively, "Appellants") appeal from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences affirming the rejection of claims 11-13, 35-38, 43, 44, 46-49, 51-54, 56-61, 63, and 64 of United States patent application 08/485,129 under the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112. In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases