BURKE v. VOICESTREAM WIRELESS CORP. II

No. 1 CA-CV 02-0031.

87 P.3d 81 (2004)

207 Ariz. 393

James F. BURKE and Margaret A. Burke, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross Appellees, v. VOICESTREAM WIRELESS CORPORATION II, a Washington corporation; Voicestream PCS III, a Delaware corporation; Scottsdale Worship Center, Defendants-Appellees, Cross Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

March 30, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cheifetz & Iannitelli, P.C. By Claudio E. Iannitelli, Antonino Abate, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellants/Cross Appellees.

Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P. By David E. Rauch, Martha E. Gibbs, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellee/Cross Appellant Voicestream.

Simbro White & Barfield, P.C. By Stephen B. White, Scottsdale, Attorneys for Appellee/Cross Appellant Scottsdale Worship Center.


OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 The trial court ruled that the deed restrictions for a residential subdivision did not prohibit the construction and continuing presence of a cellular telephone signal transmission tower on church premises within the subdivision. We reverse. The deed restrictions apply to the tower and are enforceable by appellants James F. and Margaret A. Burke.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In 1992, the Burkes purchased the home...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases