U.S. v. AYENI

No. 02-3119.

374 F.3d 1313 (2004)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Shola AYENI, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided July 20, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter S. Spivack, appointed by the court, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Keith J. Benes.

Elizabeth H. Danello, Assistant U.S. Attorney, argued the cause for appellee. With her on the brief were Roscoe C. Howard, Jr., U.S. Attorney, and John R. Fisher, Roy W. McLeese III, and Steven J. Durham, Assistant U.S. Attorneys.

Before: RANDOLPH, TATEL, and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

PER CURIAM:

Convicted by a jury of committing and conspiring to commit fraud and theft from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, appellant argues that the district court improperly allowed counsel to offer supplemental arguments in response to factual questions that the jury asked after commencing its deliberations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases