UNITED STATES, Plaintiff,
v.
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC., d/b/a ITT Jabsco, Defendant.
United States Court of International Trade.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 8, 2004.
July 8, 2004.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Barbara S. Williams, Attorneyin-Charge, International Trade Field Office, Mikki Graves Walser, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, AnnMarie R. Highsmith, Attorney, Office of Assistant Chief Counsel, U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Edward N. Maurer, Attorney, Office of Assistant Chief Counsel, U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff, of counsel.
Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, Washington, DC (Rufus E. Jarman, Jr., Diane A. MacDonald, Helena D. Sullivan) for Defendant.
United States Court of International Trade.
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
Plaintiff United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection1 moves for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT Rule 56, seeking payment of a civil penalty, together with pre-judgment and postjudgment interest. Defendant ITT Industries, Inc., d/b/a ITT Jabsco ("Jabsco"), opposes Plaintiffs motion and moves for summary judgment, asserting that because Customs improperly calculated the actual loss of antidumping...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.